What are anabolic steroid cycles? Surely you have heard more than once about the cycles in a gym in with colleagues from the world of bodybuilding . If you are thinking of consuming these substances, you need to know what are anabolic steroid cyclesHere we explain you in detail, so keep reading.

With the wide variety of anabolic and androgenic steroids available, planning the most appropriate cycle can seem like a difficult task for those new to the world of steroids. Even if we have settled for a particular drug or drug combination, it is still easy to doubt whether we are not using it in the most effective way. This is one of those topics that can be more confusing with research, as you will find the popular literature filled with various theories of receptor response, cycle, decline, and receptor response (upregulation / downregulation).

In this article we will focus on the most fundamental aspects for the use of these drugs. Before starting, I remind you that if you are looking to improve the development of your muscles, there are alternatives with less risk for your body. For example, a balanced nutrition; Therefore, if you eat the right foods, you will enhance your results in the gym and as a result you will develop greater muscle mass.

It should be noted that each individual finds out from his or her own experience what works best for him or her; therefore no one can authoritatively say that there is a “right” way to use steroids . Here are some things to think about when deciding on the right cycle for your needs.

What are anabolic steroid cycles?

A cycle of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids or EAAs or anabolic is a dosed administration scheme or program, based on a strategic combination of steroids, with the purpose of maximizing the results obtained by the athlete, reducing side effects and minimizing the total economic cost of the steroids to use. They are also known as stack or cycles in English.


It is extremely common practice for one to take more than one individual steroid during a cycle. By taking a combination of steroids, the user is of course trying to improve the quantity / quality of muscle mass gained from drug therapy. I’m sure it comes as no surprise that stacking is generally an effective practice, it should probably give you considerable bulk, using two strong androgens like testosterone and Anadrol 50 would be one of the more powerful cycles to try, but this combination too it would lead to very obvious and strong side effects, just as it can be too uncomfortable for some people.

In this case it may be a good suggestion to combine a milder anabolic with a base androgen instead. A stack such as Deca-Durabolin and Dianabol would still produce formidable gains in muscle mass, but would provide the user with much less water / fat retention, gynecomastia, hair loss / growth, and acne than the former. On the other hand, non-aromatizable anabolic are typically the preferred class of steroids for cutting / dieting training phases. This is because the lack of estrogen conversion makes them less apt to induce the accumulation of fat and water.

It is important to remember, however, that these steroids can still suppress endogenous testosterone production during a cycle. Since the drugs administered may not provide the body with sufficient androgen content to compensate for this loss; this type of cycle can sometimes interfere with aggression and libido (Deca is a common offender). In such a state, the user may feel depressed and unmotivated, seriously reducing the quality (results and comfort) of the cycle.

anabolic steroid cyclesTherefore, it is a good idea to include some type of androgens during this type of cycle, especially if you have experienced such problems before.

The preference would be a non-aromatic androgenic compound such as Proviron®, Halotestin®, or trenbolone, which will not increase the likelihood of fat / water retention. In the absence of excess estrogen, the increased level of androgens caused by these drugs can improve the elimination of body fat, and markedly increase the appearance of hardness / density to the body (provided the user’s body fat percentage is sufficiently low enough to make this visible). If these compounds were not available, perhaps a weekly (low dose) dose of testosterone would be sufficient to avoid any problems.

Finally, it is also good to remember that it is not absolutely necessary to take more than one steroid at a time. The term most frequently heard is synergy, which implies that two (or more) steroids used together often complement (and amplify) each other, providing greater muscle gain than if they had been used consecutively. Although not well understood, a number of studies suggest that different modes of action for steroids may exist outside of the androgen receptor (which seems to support the notion that cooperative or synergistic effects can be seen with different drug arrangements).

Athletes also seem to know that certain drug combinations work very well together (Deca & Dianabol , Testosterone and Anadrol 50®, Trenbolone and Winstrol®, etc.), which is a testament to the notion of drug synergy. But this should not be confused with the idea that you cannot make a profit with just one drug. For example, an athlete new to the world of steroids could achieve exceptional gains on a testosterone, Anadrol 50® or Dianabol cycle, without the need to add a second drug. Strongly increased dosages and multi-drug stacks are also more prominent among those already very familiar with steroid use and find they are necessary to continue to gain or maintain muscle mass.

Dosage and Mega dosing

There are many different opinions as to exactly what dosage an individual should use of any particular drug in order to obtain optimal results. Some seem to find that they make exceptional gains at relatively low doses of most steroids, while others insist that they need to deliver very large amounts of androgens for the proper level of volume. While I would make no claim to having the one-size-fits-all solution, I would say that most steroids seem to work best in a particular range of dosages, and generally fall short of expectations as we go down or down. On the one hand, we may find that going below what is considered a normal dose for a specific drug will result in a very poor gain,

anabolic steroid cyclesFor example, 200-800mg of Testosterone Enanthate per week is typically enough for a man to receive very formidable gains, while 50-100mg may not provide very noticeable results at all (of course this is all common sense). At the other extreme, athletes generally find that unusually large doses (say 1000-2000 mg per week) will provide a relatively low increase in quality over the normal dosage range.

Yes, the amount of muscle mass can be considerably higher than expected with a typical dose, but this will probably not be proportional to the new body fat and water weight gain. The user is usually saturated with a much more noticeable level of side effects, while receiving a poor return (such as solid muscle mass) on their money. When steroids were plentiful and cheap in the 1980s, mega dosing among recreational steroid users was not that uncommon. Certainly paying $ 20 per week instead of $ 5 was not a very difficult decision to make.

But today high prices will generally prevent the widespread practice of overdosing, as such a cycle could cost hundreds of dollars each week. The note on this side is that you can reach an extreme level of development in the year round. High dose steroid use is a must to maintain an anabolic state.

Anabolic Steroid cycles time

There are also many arguments as to how long one should stay on a steroid cycle before taking a break. Opinions range from those of prudent individuals, who are often vehement about short cycles and long off periods, to the seriously hard-core user who suggests year-round use for optimal results. Since it is really up to the person to choose the cycle that is best for him or her, I can only provide very basic advice.

anabolic steroid cyclesFor starters, it is very important to watch your duration of consumption on stronger or more toxic substances. This includes all oral c17 alpha alkylated, or high dose cycles of easily flavored steroids. These compounds put the most stress on your organs, and should likewise be used for only limited intervals (preferably less than 8 weeks). Afterwards a break of at least that long (preferably longer) should be taken to give the body enough time to rest / recover. For those who refuse to follow such advice, blood work and regular health check-ups must be an absolute must.

By taking milder anabolics like Deca-Durabolin® , Primobolan®, or Equipoise, one might choose to take the medications for longer. This is due to the fact that these compounds do not act in an extremely dramatic way, and instead promote a slow but consistent build-up of muscle tissue. With this understanding it is not uncommon for an athlete to find a cycle of three, even four or more months to be the most appropriate. If used only for a short period of time, the individual may find the overall gains to be boring.

Year round steroid use It should be avoided, if possible, as one must respect the natural hormonal balance his body strives for. The body really should be allowed time to regain a natural hormonal balance from time to time, to ensure that there is little chance of future problems. Although many believe that the effects of these drugs are fully 100% reversible, it is not impossible to see problems with virility, libido, etc. after the body has been overloaded with hormones for many years. The health risks associated with high cholesterol levels, high blood pressure, or liver toxicity are, of course, important reasons why the athlete should limit the duration of steroid intake. It is important to respect these drugs, not abuse them.

Progressive reduction

One of the most fundamental beliefs among steroid users is that tapering, or the practice of slowly reducing your drug dose when interrupting a cycle, is an absolute must when you want to preserve your newly gained muscle mass . It is rare to find an athlete who does not religiously dedicate (at least) three or four weeks to a schedule that decreases after each serious cycle. The belief is that the body will notice the decrease in androgen level, and compensate by resuming the manufacture of testosterone.

Unfortunately, you will see that this theory is, in fact, very flawed. This is because for testosterone production to be fully restored, the body will have to recognize an androgen deficiency, not just a drop in steroid dosage.

For example, since even one Dianabol tablet could provide the equivalent of a day’s supply of androgens for the average male, narrowing five, four, three etc. In the three to four weeks that the athlete is going to spend doing this, their body keeps reading “androgen overload,” and it is not trying to restore testosterone production. This, of course, holds true for all anabolic steroids , not just strong androgens.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that even tapering with mild anabolic like Primobolan® or Anavar (normally considered mild in terms of testosterone suppression) is sufficient to prevent or delay a hormonal rebound.

So if tapering off is useless, what should the athlete do to properly interrupt a steroid cycle? Of course, the obvious answer is to pay much more attention to secondary drug use than to decrease. Proper application of testosterone-boosting compounds such as HCG, Clomid®, Nolvadex®, and / or cyclohexyl are the most critical, as these can greatly aid in balancing the body’s hormones. In the few cycles that I have illustrated in this section, you will notice that I have not even bothered to lower the doses of the drugs before adding the auxiliary drugs. Simply put, there is no need.

Be careful, before planning any steroid cycle, look for solutions according to your rhythm of life. If you want long-term results without risks, you can turn to nutrition. A good diet represents a significant change in your person, as a result you will improve your mood, so you can train with more energy. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.